Iryna Shymanovich vs Aurora Zantedeschi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Analyzing their recent six-month performance on second serves, Zantedeschi has secured 37.85% of the points, while Shymanovich has managed 39.16%. This statistic holds a strong correlation with the accuracy of match predictions, offering insights into the players' efficiency in this aspect.

When examining return game stats during the same period, Zantedeschi has won 46% of their opponent's second serve points in recent form, whereas Shymanovich stands slightly higher at 50%. For first serve returns, Zantedeschi and Shymanovich achieved 31.14% and 32.75%, respectively, establishing Shymanovich as the marginal favorite in potential match predictions.

Under pressure, Shymanovich shows a slight edge by saving 47.35% of breakpoints encountered, compared to Zantedeschi's 45.54%. These metrics can be pivotal for in-game betting decisions, particularly when matches are closely contested.

Assessing overall performance over the last year, Zantedeschi boasts a match win percentage of 60.87% (W/L 42/27), while Shymanovich achieved 57.81% (W/L 37/27), indicating that both players have had solid seasons, albeit with Zantedeschi marginally ahead in this regard.

Looking at surface preferences, both players excel on clay. Zantedeschi has a career win percentage of 60% (W/L 165/111) on Clay with their lowest on Indoor Hard courts at 33% (W/L 5/10). Conversely, Shymanovich performs best on Clay with a 70% win rate (W/L 128/56) but struggles on grass with a 0% win rate (W/L 0/3).

Analyzing their level of competition, both players predominantly compete in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, where Zantedeschi won 60.34% of their matches (W/L 35/23) and Shymanovich won 59.65% (W/L 34/23). These figures highlight their competitiveness at this tier, establishing a baseline for who may be favored given the event level.

In head-to-head encounters, Shymanovich leads having won their solitary prior meeting 6-0, 6-3 at the W 80 Valencia in 2021 on clay, providing a significant psychological advantage. This match spanned an average duration of 1:30:0, with no tiebreaks or deciding sets played between them yet.

For potential deciding set scenarios across all matches over the past year, Zantedeschi displays a robust success rate of 71% in such situations, compared to Shymanovich's 50%. If this upcoming match reaches a deciding set, Zantedeschi's resilience could become a deciding factor in the final outcome.

Break-point conversion rates in recent form stand at 45.79% for Zantedeschi and 40.12% for Shymanovich, suggesting Zantedeschi's slight advantage in capitalizing on critical opportunities. This can be a vital statistic for live betting, providing actionable insights when either is poised to break.

Analyzing these performance metrics, a nuanced yet tangible advantage leans towards Shymanovich given their superior returns and previous H2H victory. However, should the match extend to a deciding set, Zantedeschi's track record provides a compelling counterbalance, making for an intriguing matchup. Nevertheless, based on the collective data, Shymanovich is the more likely victor in this impending clash.